当前位置: 首页 > 图文教程 > 网络编程 > ASP.NET > IsVS.NETreadyforenterprise?(5)

ASP.NET
一个有KeepConnection开关的C#的Database类
用控件仅一条指令实现界面换肤和多语言版本
.net datagrid 选择多行
一个用C#写的词法分析程序
关于C#下写的Web Service 服务在Delphi下调用时的问题
多线程填写treeview控件(vb.net)
使用TreeView实现无限级扩展节点
用C#写的一个简单屏幕保护程序
详解对密码执行散列和 salt 运算方法
vb.net的windows窗体实现dos命令
为您的应用程序加上注册的限制
用VS.NET2003制作WEB应用程序的安装包
怎么由DataSet将数据导入Excel?
Visual Basic串口通讯调试方法
QQ验证码识别源代码(C#/NET1.1)
一个用Wsh来控制SqlServer的Dcom的VBs
24点的算法
asp.net 关于form认证的一般设置
和我一起入门Direct3D的VB.net编程
部署ASP.NET的三大技术(1)

ASP.NET 中的 IsVS.NETreadyforenterprise?(5)


出处:互联网   整理: 软晨网(RuanChen.com)   发布: 2009-11-03   浏览: 82 ::
收藏到网摘: n/a


LT: For the uninitiated, what抯 the relationship or difference between the .NET framework and pattern mechanisms? For someone used to working on a more granular level, where should they start to master this approach?
MD: Pattern mechanism is a tool (an add-in) that supports model-to-model transformations specified in the form of a pattern with additional transformation semantics. In other words, you define a pattern in such a way, that it can be applied to a model and that will perform model transforms.
A .NET framework is preconfigured solution (where a solution is an integrated set of .NET language projects). The preconfiguration includes (this might be an incomplete list):Some initial content in the language projects. Customization of and constraints on the VS development environment (for example, you can disable some operations on a project, change menus, and so on). Customization and extension to the dynamic help system.

In our RDA Online Retail Kit (Rational Development Accelerator Kit), we are using both. We have created an EFT for our framework and we have created a set of patterns for customizing and extending the framework.
LT: I've been seeing texts about patterns for years. How does .NET make pattern-based architectures more doable?
MD: The key is if this is all separate from runtime environment and the implementation tools, it will be hard to do. Architectures can't be abstract patterns only analysts do. They must be real live artifacts that developers can connect directly to implementation artifacts such as Visual Studio .NET. It's also easier to generate testing from such models, because the models and the code can be much more tightly coupled, as ours are.
So it allows us to make the models more valuable. You can generate test cases, allow for model-driven development, and even debug at the model level later on. It makes the models more live—more tightly coupled with the implementation artifacts—and lets the developer view the model as a different way to interact with the application.