当前位置: 首页 > 图文教程 > 网络编程 > ASP.NET > IsVS.NETreadyforenterprise?(5)

ASP.NET
现有的Web打印控制技术的方案
一段实现DataGrid的“编辑”、“取消”功能脚本
.Net中将图片数据保存到XML文档
如何在C#的WinForm中制作饼状图和柱状图
在RichTextBox控件加入图片
C#写的数据库操作类!
使用响应文件编译C#源文件
在 Visual Basic .NET 中实现后台进程(一)
在 Visual Basic .NET 中实现后台进程(二)
在 Visual Basic .NET 中实现后台进程(三)
用C#写vs插件中的一些Tip
C++编程人员容易犯的10个C#错
在Repeater中嵌套使用Repeater
Project级别的权限控制
一个FTP客户端的C#代码
用c#写的smtp邮件发送类
挤压造型Extrusion的节点说明和应用实例
.net 里面 protected private 的变量也可以访问
signlog 登陆实现
利用自定义事件实现不同窗体间的通讯 -- C#篇

ASP.NET 中的 IsVS.NETreadyforenterprise?(5)


出处:互联网   整理: 软晨网(RuanChen.com)   发布: 2009-11-03   浏览: 83 ::
收藏到网摘: n/a


LT: For the uninitiated, what抯 the relationship or difference between the .NET framework and pattern mechanisms? For someone used to working on a more granular level, where should they start to master this approach?
MD: Pattern mechanism is a tool (an add-in) that supports model-to-model transformations specified in the form of a pattern with additional transformation semantics. In other words, you define a pattern in such a way, that it can be applied to a model and that will perform model transforms.
A .NET framework is preconfigured solution (where a solution is an integrated set of .NET language projects). The preconfiguration includes (this might be an incomplete list):Some initial content in the language projects. Customization of and constraints on the VS development environment (for example, you can disable some operations on a project, change menus, and so on). Customization and extension to the dynamic help system.

In our RDA Online Retail Kit (Rational Development Accelerator Kit), we are using both. We have created an EFT for our framework and we have created a set of patterns for customizing and extending the framework.
LT: I've been seeing texts about patterns for years. How does .NET make pattern-based architectures more doable?
MD: The key is if this is all separate from runtime environment and the implementation tools, it will be hard to do. Architectures can't be abstract patterns only analysts do. They must be real live artifacts that developers can connect directly to implementation artifacts such as Visual Studio .NET. It's also easier to generate testing from such models, because the models and the code can be much more tightly coupled, as ours are.
So it allows us to make the models more valuable. You can generate test cases, allow for model-driven development, and even debug at the model level later on. It makes the models more live—more tightly coupled with the implementation artifacts—and lets the developer view the model as a different way to interact with the application.