当前位置: 首页 > 图文教程 > 操作系统 > Unix/Linux > stallman 谈黑客

Unix/Linux
实用技巧:sys 请求:内核严重错误?没问题[ZT]
LINUX 的 HOSTID
出现这个信息:neighbour table overflow,什么原因?
如果用的是SCSI硬盘,在GRUB中显示root(hd0,0)对吗?
介绍一个下载LINUX、UNIX资料的网站,很不错
大家谁知道jdk那种.bin的安装文件是怎么做的?
如何新增一块硬盘
大侠帮我看看,怎么多了条route?
不用root密码也可以執行root的程序--Sudo
访问控制大师,使用pam来支持login的访问控制
Linux知识宝库:Kylix经典十大难题解决方法
小技巧:自制c语言编制cgi实现搜索
数据库管理员的难题,选择MySQL还是SQLServer
一托N的实现GRUB引导多个操作系统
网络技术之Linux网络的IPv6应用(1)
网络技术之Linux网络的IPv6应用(2)
网络技术之Linux网络的IPv6应用(3)
MySQL的远程连接出现错误提示分析
利用Perl列出系统环境变量清单范例
系统管理员必备常识之RAID磁盘阵列

Unix/Linux 中的 stallman 谈黑客


出处:互联网   整理: 软晨网(RuanChen.com)   发布: 2009-11-01   浏览: 137 ::
收藏到网摘: n/a

It is hard to write a simple definition of something as varied ashacking, but I think what these activities have in common isplayfulness, cleverness, and exploration. Thus, hacking meansexploring the limits of what is possible, in a spirit of playfulcleverness. Activities that display playful cleverness have "hackvalue".
Hackers typically had little respect for the silly rules thatadministrators like to impose, so they looked for ways around. Forinstance, when computers at MIT started to have "security" (that is,restrictions on what users could do), some hackers found clever waysto bypass the security, partly so they could use the computers freely,and partly just for the sake of cleverness (hacking does not need tobe useful). However, only some hackers did this--many were occupiedwith other kinds of cleverness, such as placing some amusing object ontop of MIT's great dome (**),finding a way to do a certain computation with only 5 instructionswhen the shortest known program required 6, writing a program to printnumbers in roman numerals, or writing a program to understandquestions in English.

Meanwhile, another group of hackers at MIT found a different solutionto the problem of computer security: they designed the Incompatible Timesharing System without security "features". In the hacker'sparadise, the glory days of the Artificial Intelligence Lab, there wasno security breaking, because there was no security to break. It wasthere, in that environment, that I learned to be a hacker, though Ihad shown the inclination previously. We had plenty of other domainsin which to be playfully clever, without building artificial securityobstacles which then had to be overcome.
Yet when I say I am a hacker, people often think I am making a naughtyadmission, presenting myself specifically as a security breaker. Howdid this confusion develop?
Around 1980, when the news media took notice of hackers, they fixatedon one narrow aspect of real hacking: the security breaking which somehackers occasionally did. They ignored all the rest of hacking, andtook the term to mean breaking security, no more and no less. The media have since spread that definition, disregarding our attempts tocorrect them. As a result, most people have a mistaken idea of whatwe hackers actually do and what we think.
You can help correct the misunderstanding simply by making adistinction between security breaking and hacking--by using the term"cracking" for security breaking. The people who do it are"crackers". Some of them may also be hackers, just as some of themmay be chess players or golfers; most of them are not.