当前位置: 首页 > 图文教程 > 操作系统 > Unix/Linux > stallman 谈黑客

Unix/Linux
Linux下XFConfig的有效使用
在Linux下如何驱动D-linkDFE-530TX网卡
Linux上的sysctl
GRUB引导管理器下,如何恢复redhatlinux的root密码?
为最佳性能而调优RedHat(5)
为最佳性能而调优RedHat(2)
Linux问与答(2):KDE问题
IBM有哪些开放集群系统,它们的区别是什么?
zSeriesLinux可以运行在哪个版本的VM下?
zSeries的Linux有什么主要元素构成?
i系列上运行的Linux分区数量和Linux版本
简易的proxy程序的开发过程(2)
Linux-PAM系统管理指南(1)
网管要用Linux
LILO可以装在软盘上
如何在两台linux服务器之间用RSA键对的方法SSH/SCP不需密码
linux路由器下如何限制某几个IP连接互联网,而同时防止IP盗用
如何使用UUCP
Linux下的NFS
IntelI810主板的X的安装

Unix/Linux 中的 stallman 谈黑客


出处:互联网   整理: 软晨网(RuanChen.com)   发布: 2009-11-01   浏览: 118 ::
收藏到网摘: n/a

It is hard to write a simple definition of something as varied ashacking, but I think what these activities have in common isplayfulness, cleverness, and exploration. Thus, hacking meansexploring the limits of what is possible, in a spirit of playfulcleverness. Activities that display playful cleverness have "hackvalue".
Hackers typically had little respect for the silly rules thatadministrators like to impose, so they looked for ways around. Forinstance, when computers at MIT started to have "security" (that is,restrictions on what users could do), some hackers found clever waysto bypass the security, partly so they could use the computers freely,and partly just for the sake of cleverness (hacking does not need tobe useful). However, only some hackers did this--many were occupiedwith other kinds of cleverness, such as placing some amusing object ontop of MIT's great dome (**),finding a way to do a certain computation with only 5 instructionswhen the shortest known program required 6, writing a program to printnumbers in roman numerals, or writing a program to understandquestions in English.

Meanwhile, another group of hackers at MIT found a different solutionto the problem of computer security: they designed the Incompatible Timesharing System without security "features". In the hacker'sparadise, the glory days of the Artificial Intelligence Lab, there wasno security breaking, because there was no security to break. It wasthere, in that environment, that I learned to be a hacker, though Ihad shown the inclination previously. We had plenty of other domainsin which to be playfully clever, without building artificial securityobstacles which then had to be overcome.
Yet when I say I am a hacker, people often think I am making a naughtyadmission, presenting myself specifically as a security breaker. Howdid this confusion develop?
Around 1980, when the news media took notice of hackers, they fixatedon one narrow aspect of real hacking: the security breaking which somehackers occasionally did. They ignored all the rest of hacking, andtook the term to mean breaking security, no more and no less. The media have since spread that definition, disregarding our attempts tocorrect them. As a result, most people have a mistaken idea of whatwe hackers actually do and what we think.
You can help correct the misunderstanding simply by making adistinction between security breaking and hacking--by using the term"cracking" for security breaking. The people who do it are"crackers". Some of them may also be hackers, just as some of themmay be chess players or golfers; most of them are not.