当前位置: 首页 > 图文教程 > 网络编程 > Javascript > javascript 字符串连接的性能问题(多浏览器)

Javascript
Add a Table to a Word Document
Add Formatted Text to a Word Document
用jscript实现新建word文档
用jscript实现新建和保存一个word文档
Open and Print a Word Document
Use Word to Search for Files
Convert Seconds To Hours
Sample script that deletes a SQL Server database
Sample script that displays all of the users in a given SQL Server DB
firefox中用javascript实现鼠标位置的定位
div+css实现鼠标放上去,背景跟图片都会变化。
Locate a File Using a File Open Dialog Box
Save a File Using a File Save Dialog Box
用jscript实现列出安装的软件列表
List the Stored Procedures in a SQL Server database
Display SQL Server Login Mode
Display SQL Server Version Information
List all the Databases on a SQL Server
用jscript启动sqlserver
Stop SQL Server

Javascript 中的 javascript 字符串连接的性能问题(多浏览器)


出处:互联网   整理: 软晨网(RuanChen.com)   发布: 2009-09-12   浏览: 155 ::
收藏到网摘: n/a

今天看了javascript 高级程序设计 谈到了字符串连接的性能问题 书中附带的测试代码如下
复制代码 代码如下:

<html>
<head>
<title>Example</title>
</head>
<body>
<p><strong>Note:</strong> The latest versions of Firefox seem to have fixed the string concatenation problem. If you are using Firefox 1.0 or later, the string buffer may actually take longer than normal string concatenation.</p>
<script type="text/javascript">
function StringBuffer() {
this.__strings__ = new Array;
}
StringBuffer.prototype.append = function (str) {
this.__strings__.push(str);
};
StringBuffer.prototype.toString = function () {
return this.__strings__.join("");
};
var d1 = new Date();
var str = "";
for (var i=0; i < 10000; i++) {
str += "text";
}
var d2 = new Date();
document.write("Concatenation with plus: " + (d2.getTime() - d1.getTime()) + " milliseconds");
var buffer = new StringBuffer();
d1 = new Date();
for (var i=0; i < 10000; i++) {
buffer.append("text");
}
var result = buffer.toString();
d2 = new Date();
document.write("<br />Concatenation with StringBuffer: " + (d2.getTime() - d1.getTime()) + " milliseconds");
</script>
</body>
</html>

在 Firefox/3.0.3中执行的结果如下:
Concatenation with plus: 5 milliseconds
Concatenation with StringBuffer: 10 milliseconds
在IE6中执行结果如下:
Concatenation with plus: 234 milliseconds
Concatenation with StringBuffer: 62 milliseconds
1.两种方式性能差别很大
2.看来IE6字符串连接处理能力比FF3很差呀
3.IE6和FF3两种方式结果相反,看来以后写连接优化还有注意浏览器呀