当前位置: 首页 > 图文教程 > 网络编程 > ASP.NET > IsVS.NETreadyforenterprise?(5)

ASP.NET
asp.net DiscuzNT登录,退出的代码
ASP .NET中执行控件(如ImageButton、LinkButton等)命令不刷新页面
Microsoft SQL Server 2005 Express 远程访问设置详述,100%成功篇
使用.NET命令行编译器编译项目(如ASP.NET、C#等)
asp.net 去除viewstate
asp.net repeater实现批量删除
asp.net安全、实用、简单的大容量存储过程分页
asp.net 获取图片高度和宽度实例代码
在GridView中LinkButton的属性的应用(如何不用选中就删除这一行)
关于.net(C#)中的跨进程访问的问题
asp.net request.PathInfo实现的url重写
asp.net SqlDataReader绑定Repeater
ASP.NET 动态写入服务器端控件
Discuz .net版本中的短消息系统
asp.net动态加载用户控件,关于后台添加、修改的思考
.net Cookies安全性实践分析
配置Visual Studio 以调试.net framework源代码
asp.net 大文件上传 之 改版了的SlickUpload.HttpUploadModule(Krystalware.SlickUpload.dll)
asp.net Web站点风格切换的实现
asp.net 用户控件中图片及样式问题

ASP.NET 中的 IsVS.NETreadyforenterprise?(5)


出处:互联网   整理: 软晨网(RuanChen.com)   发布: 2009-11-03   浏览: 95 ::
收藏到网摘: n/a


LT: For the uninitiated, what抯 the relationship or difference between the .NET framework and pattern mechanisms? For someone used to working on a more granular level, where should they start to master this approach?
MD: Pattern mechanism is a tool (an add-in) that supports model-to-model transformations specified in the form of a pattern with additional transformation semantics. In other words, you define a pattern in such a way, that it can be applied to a model and that will perform model transforms.
A .NET framework is preconfigured solution (where a solution is an integrated set of .NET language projects). The preconfiguration includes (this might be an incomplete list):Some initial content in the language projects. Customization of and constraints on the VS development environment (for example, you can disable some operations on a project, change menus, and so on). Customization and extension to the dynamic help system.

In our RDA Online Retail Kit (Rational Development Accelerator Kit), we are using both. We have created an EFT for our framework and we have created a set of patterns for customizing and extending the framework.
LT: I've been seeing texts about patterns for years. How does .NET make pattern-based architectures more doable?
MD: The key is if this is all separate from runtime environment and the implementation tools, it will be hard to do. Architectures can't be abstract patterns only analysts do. They must be real live artifacts that developers can connect directly to implementation artifacts such as Visual Studio .NET. It's also easier to generate testing from such models, because the models and the code can be much more tightly coupled, as ours are.
So it allows us to make the models more valuable. You can generate test cases, allow for model-driven development, and even debug at the model level later on. It makes the models more live—more tightly coupled with the implementation artifacts—and lets the developer view the model as a different way to interact with the application.