当前位置: 首页 > 图文教程 > 网络编程 > ASP.NET > IsVS.NETreadyforenterprise?(5)

ASP.NET
LinQ学习之旅 从整型数组中找出偶数
解析:如何在 ASP.NET 中下载文件
无废话C#设计模式之九:Proxy
Asp.net中实现从弹出窗口中选择值
.Net中给TreeView控件的节点赋id值
ASP.NET 清除 HTML 标记函数
C#之 VS2008 之 Extension Methods
通过 C# 简化 APM
.Net调用Java webservice访问被拒绝解决方案
C#学习之类的访问修饰符
ASP.NET AJAX中的异步Web Services调用
.Net中生成二维的表格的代码
C#中的两个+(plus)操作符解析
Asp.net 2.0的TreeView客户端个性化控制
直接访问WebBrowser控件中的HTML源码
ASP.NET AJAX中的非同步PageMethod调用
利用C#实现分布式数据库查询
Web Services开发体会和在项目中的教训
开发学习之.Net中PE文件的结构
用C#实现启动另一程序的方法

ASP.NET 中的 IsVS.NETreadyforenterprise?(5)


出处:互联网   整理: 软晨网(RuanChen.com)   发布: 2009-11-03   浏览: 118 ::
收藏到网摘: n/a


LT: For the uninitiated, what抯 the relationship or difference between the .NET framework and pattern mechanisms? For someone used to working on a more granular level, where should they start to master this approach?
MD: Pattern mechanism is a tool (an add-in) that supports model-to-model transformations specified in the form of a pattern with additional transformation semantics. In other words, you define a pattern in such a way, that it can be applied to a model and that will perform model transforms.
A .NET framework is preconfigured solution (where a solution is an integrated set of .NET language projects). The preconfiguration includes (this might be an incomplete list):Some initial content in the language projects. Customization of and constraints on the VS development environment (for example, you can disable some operations on a project, change menus, and so on). Customization and extension to the dynamic help system.

In our RDA Online Retail Kit (Rational Development Accelerator Kit), we are using both. We have created an EFT for our framework and we have created a set of patterns for customizing and extending the framework.
LT: I've been seeing texts about patterns for years. How does .NET make pattern-based architectures more doable?
MD: The key is if this is all separate from runtime environment and the implementation tools, it will be hard to do. Architectures can't be abstract patterns only analysts do. They must be real live artifacts that developers can connect directly to implementation artifacts such as Visual Studio .NET. It's also easier to generate testing from such models, because the models and the code can be much more tightly coupled, as ours are.
So it allows us to make the models more valuable. You can generate test cases, allow for model-driven development, and even debug at the model level later on. It makes the models more live—more tightly coupled with the implementation artifacts—and lets the developer view the model as a different way to interact with the application.