当前位置: 首页 > 图文教程 > 网络编程 > ASP.NET > IsVS.NETreadyforenterprise?(5)

ASP.NET
ASP.NET应用程序设计的10大技巧
asp.net开发与web标准的冲突问题
总结:ADO.NET中容易混淆的概念
ASP.NET数据库编程入门
ASP.Net网络数据库:连接到数据库
ASP.Net之C#中的异常处理
在C++中使用Lambda函数提高代码性能
从零开始学习jQuery (一) 开天辟地入门篇
.Net中的 XmlReader 与 XmlWriter 解析
ASP.NET安全问题--创建安全的Web应用程序
从零开始学习jQuery (二) 万能的选择器
ASP.NET开发必须养成的编程习惯
ASP.NET应用XML技术实现Web报表打印
ASP.NET实现静态的TreeView控件导航
数据结构与算法:C#语言描述 目录
ASP.NET创建XML Web服务全接触
使.NET命名空间符合标准
ASP.Net获得新浪天气预报几种方式总结
.Net技术开发中两个“属性”引起的歧异
.Net课堂:ASP.NET常用的优化性能方法

ASP.NET 中的 IsVS.NETreadyforenterprise?(5)


出处:互联网   整理: 软晨网(RuanChen.com)   发布: 2009-11-03   浏览: 140 ::
收藏到网摘: n/a


LT: For the uninitiated, what抯 the relationship or difference between the .NET framework and pattern mechanisms? For someone used to working on a more granular level, where should they start to master this approach?
MD: Pattern mechanism is a tool (an add-in) that supports model-to-model transformations specified in the form of a pattern with additional transformation semantics. In other words, you define a pattern in such a way, that it can be applied to a model and that will perform model transforms.
A .NET framework is preconfigured solution (where a solution is an integrated set of .NET language projects). The preconfiguration includes (this might be an incomplete list):Some initial content in the language projects. Customization of and constraints on the VS development environment (for example, you can disable some operations on a project, change menus, and so on). Customization and extension to the dynamic help system.

In our RDA Online Retail Kit (Rational Development Accelerator Kit), we are using both. We have created an EFT for our framework and we have created a set of patterns for customizing and extending the framework.
LT: I've been seeing texts about patterns for years. How does .NET make pattern-based architectures more doable?
MD: The key is if this is all separate from runtime environment and the implementation tools, it will be hard to do. Architectures can't be abstract patterns only analysts do. They must be real live artifacts that developers can connect directly to implementation artifacts such as Visual Studio .NET. It's also easier to generate testing from such models, because the models and the code can be much more tightly coupled, as ours are.
So it allows us to make the models more valuable. You can generate test cases, allow for model-driven development, and even debug at the model level later on. It makes the models more live—more tightly coupled with the implementation artifacts—and lets the developer view the model as a different way to interact with the application.