当前位置: 首页 > 图文教程 > 网络编程 > ASP.NET > IsVS.NETreadyforenterprise?(5)

ASP.NET
漫谈.Net开发关于命名空间和目录划分
.net中关于企业Excel报表的生成
.NET中取得IP/用户名等信息常用方法
关于.Net开发下的分布式缓存设计
.NET中为组合框添加自动查询功能
ASP.NET如何进行性能优化问题
开发中如何有效监控.NET应用程序
ASP.NET2.0 显示写入日期和时间语法
用.NET Array类的Sort方法分类数值
Asp.net Mvc Pv4中使用AjaxHelper
Asp.net中Forms验证的角色验证授权(一)
Asp.net中Forms验证的角色验证授权(二)
Asp.Net2.0数据库基本操作方法学习
Asp.Net之枚举类型输出需要类型转换
用.NET的File控件上传文件的解决方案
.NET泛型技巧之类型参数之间的转换
在ASP.NET中将数据直接输出成Excel格式
在.NET框架下使用自定义配置设置
跟ASP.NET MVC一起使用jQuery
Visual Basic中文本框处理技巧集萃

ASP.NET 中的 IsVS.NETreadyforenterprise?(5)


出处:互联网   整理: 软晨网(RuanChen.com)   发布: 2009-11-03   浏览: 114 ::
收藏到网摘: n/a


LT: For the uninitiated, what抯 the relationship or difference between the .NET framework and pattern mechanisms? For someone used to working on a more granular level, where should they start to master this approach?
MD: Pattern mechanism is a tool (an add-in) that supports model-to-model transformations specified in the form of a pattern with additional transformation semantics. In other words, you define a pattern in such a way, that it can be applied to a model and that will perform model transforms.
A .NET framework is preconfigured solution (where a solution is an integrated set of .NET language projects). The preconfiguration includes (this might be an incomplete list):Some initial content in the language projects. Customization of and constraints on the VS development environment (for example, you can disable some operations on a project, change menus, and so on). Customization and extension to the dynamic help system.

In our RDA Online Retail Kit (Rational Development Accelerator Kit), we are using both. We have created an EFT for our framework and we have created a set of patterns for customizing and extending the framework.
LT: I've been seeing texts about patterns for years. How does .NET make pattern-based architectures more doable?
MD: The key is if this is all separate from runtime environment and the implementation tools, it will be hard to do. Architectures can't be abstract patterns only analysts do. They must be real live artifacts that developers can connect directly to implementation artifacts such as Visual Studio .NET. It's also easier to generate testing from such models, because the models and the code can be much more tightly coupled, as ours are.
So it allows us to make the models more valuable. You can generate test cases, allow for model-driven development, and even debug at the model level later on. It makes the models more live—more tightly coupled with the implementation artifacts—and lets the developer view the model as a different way to interact with the application.