当前位置: 首页 > 图文教程 > 网络编程 > ASP.NET > IsVS.NETreadyforenterprise?(5)

ASP.NET
asp.net Linq TO Sql 分页方法
asp.net 用XML生成放便扩展的自定义树
asp.ent下合并两个结构相同的DataTable
asp.net 遍历repeater中的控件的几种方式
asp.net 处理原文件中过长的viewstate代码
asp.net下遍历页面中所有的指定控件的代码
获取创建Membership的数据库创建脚本
asp.net AJAX注册类
asp.net 处理F5刷新页面重复提交页面的一个思路
ASP.NET 缓存分析和实践浅析提高运行效率
asp.net 读取并显示excel数据的实现代码
ASP.NET中常用的用来输出JS脚本的类
ASP.NET中内嵌页面代码的一个问题
asp.net(C#)操作excel(上路篇)
一个基于Asp.Net MVC的权限方案
ASP.NET实例教程:51job网站地区选择功能
ASP.NET教程:友好的Html和JS适合SEO
ASP.NET教程:使用.ashx文件去除重复内容
ASP.NET做SEO:制作架构清晰和更新及时的网站地图
ASP.NET优化:Sql注入和Html注入的黑帽SEO

ASP.NET 中的 IsVS.NETreadyforenterprise?(5)


出处:互联网   整理: 软晨网(RuanChen.com)   发布: 2009-11-03   浏览: 40 ::
收藏到网摘: n/a


LT: For the uninitiated, what抯 the relationship or difference between the .NET framework and pattern mechanisms? For someone used to working on a more granular level, where should they start to master this approach?
MD: Pattern mechanism is a tool (an add-in) that supports model-to-model transformations specified in the form of a pattern with additional transformation semantics. In other words, you define a pattern in such a way, that it can be applied to a model and that will perform model transforms.
A .NET framework is preconfigured solution (where a solution is an integrated set of .NET language projects). The preconfiguration includes (this might be an incomplete list):Some initial content in the language projects. Customization of and constraints on the VS development environment (for example, you can disable some operations on a project, change menus, and so on). Customization and extension to the dynamic help system.

In our RDA Online Retail Kit (Rational Development Accelerator Kit), we are using both. We have created an EFT for our framework and we have created a set of patterns for customizing and extending the framework.
LT: I've been seeing texts about patterns for years. How does .NET make pattern-based architectures more doable?
MD: The key is if this is all separate from runtime environment and the implementation tools, it will be hard to do. Architectures can't be abstract patterns only analysts do. They must be real live artifacts that developers can connect directly to implementation artifacts such as Visual Studio .NET. It's also easier to generate testing from such models, because the models and the code can be much more tightly coupled, as ours are.
So it allows us to make the models more valuable. You can generate test cases, allow for model-driven development, and even debug at the model level later on. It makes the models more live—more tightly coupled with the implementation artifacts—and lets the developer view the model as a different way to interact with the application.