当前位置: 首页 > 图文教程 > 网络编程 > ASP.NET > IsVS.NETreadyforenterprise?(5)

ASP.NET
如果操作EXCEL提示没有权限?
不让别人保存你的网页
从C#转到VB .net
创建虚拟目录的常用属性
visual studio 2005又一新增功能
Com与.Net互操作(二次业务开发及插件开发总结)
Wap页面使用asp.net中移动控件List分页(原创)
关于如何操作其他窗体的控件或变量的方法!
C#版MultiSelected DataGrid
使用非托管代码直接修改字符串
如何让一个函数返回多个值(C#)
(原创)C#编写的windows计算器----源代码
(原创)C#获取本地计算机名,IP,MAC地址
用C#读取sina天气预报到wap页面(一)(原创)
窗体问题--拖动无标题栏的窗体
写在VB.NET公共论坛的开篇语!
在VB6中动态创建使用ADO控件访问数据库
使用Visual Basic 6实现真正实用的多线程处理
设计模式之Facade:家庭篇
如何设置tabcontrol控件的tabPage的text内容显示成竖着的字体

ASP.NET 中的 IsVS.NETreadyforenterprise?(5)


出处:互联网   整理: 软晨网(RuanChen.com)   发布: 2009-11-03   浏览: 80 ::
收藏到网摘: n/a


LT: For the uninitiated, what抯 the relationship or difference between the .NET framework and pattern mechanisms? For someone used to working on a more granular level, where should they start to master this approach?
MD: Pattern mechanism is a tool (an add-in) that supports model-to-model transformations specified in the form of a pattern with additional transformation semantics. In other words, you define a pattern in such a way, that it can be applied to a model and that will perform model transforms.
A .NET framework is preconfigured solution (where a solution is an integrated set of .NET language projects). The preconfiguration includes (this might be an incomplete list):Some initial content in the language projects. Customization of and constraints on the VS development environment (for example, you can disable some operations on a project, change menus, and so on). Customization and extension to the dynamic help system.

In our RDA Online Retail Kit (Rational Development Accelerator Kit), we are using both. We have created an EFT for our framework and we have created a set of patterns for customizing and extending the framework.
LT: I've been seeing texts about patterns for years. How does .NET make pattern-based architectures more doable?
MD: The key is if this is all separate from runtime environment and the implementation tools, it will be hard to do. Architectures can't be abstract patterns only analysts do. They must be real live artifacts that developers can connect directly to implementation artifacts such as Visual Studio .NET. It's also easier to generate testing from such models, because the models and the code can be much more tightly coupled, as ours are.
So it allows us to make the models more valuable. You can generate test cases, allow for model-driven development, and even debug at the model level later on. It makes the models more live—more tightly coupled with the implementation artifacts—and lets the developer view the model as a different way to interact with the application.