当前位置: 首页 > 图文教程 > 网络编程 > ASP.NET > c#v2.0 扩展特性 翻译1

ASP.NET
AspNetPager与Socut.Data使用方法
asp.net UpdaeProgress的简单用法
asp.net ajaxControlToolkit ValidatorCalloutExtender的简单用法
asp.net 简易生成注册码(数字+大小写字母)
asp.net中利用ashx实现图片防盗链代码
ASP.NET程序中常用代码汇总
ASP.NET 2.0/3.5中直接操作Gridview控件插入新记录
ASP.NET Ajax级联DropDownList实现代码
ASP.NET 2.0写无限级下拉菜单
asp.net Web Services上传和下载文件(完整代码)
asp.net DataGrid控件中弹出详细信息窗口
Asp.NET 多层登陆实现代码
利用Asp.Net回调机制实现进度条
ASP.NET Ref和Out关键字区别分析
Javascript调用Webservice的多种方法
.Net下的签名与混淆图文分析
.Net Compact Framework开发小技巧 推荐
.Net连接Oracle数据库的实现代码
js获取.aspx页面里面的服务器控件和.ascx中的服务器控件值
asp.net下 jquery jason 高效传输数据

ASP.NET 中的 c#v2.0 扩展特性 翻译1


出处:互联网   整理: 软晨网(RuanChen.com)   发布: 2009-11-03   浏览: 59 ::
收藏到网摘: n/a

Introduction to C# 2.0 C# 2.0 introduces several language extensions, the most important of which are Generics, Anonymous Methods, Iterators, and Partial Types. C#2.0 介绍几种语言扩展,泛型,匿名方法,迭代器 和、partial Types. · Generics permit classes, structs, interfaces, delegates, and methods to be parameterized by the types of data they store and manipulate. Generics are useful because they provide stronger compile-time type checking, require fewer explicit conversions between data types, and reduce the need for boxing operations and run-time type checks. 泛型允许类,结构,接口,代理还有方法被他们存储和操作数据类型参数化。泛型相当有用,因为他们提供强制的编译时类型检查,要求更少的数据类型之间的显式转换,并减少装箱拆箱的操作和运行时类型检查。 · Anonymous methods allow code blocks to be written “in-line” where delegate values are expected. Anonymous methods are similar to lambda functions in the Lisp programming language. C# 2.0 supports the creation of “closures” where anonymous methods access surrounding local variables and parameters. · Iterators are methods that incrementally compute and yield a sequence of values. Iterators make it easy for a type to specify how the foreach statement will iterate over its elements. · Partial types allow classes, structs, and interfaces to be broken into multiple pieces stored in different source files for easier development and maintenance. Additionally, partial types allow separation of machine-generated and user-written parts of types so that it is easier to augment code generated by a tool. This chapter gives an introduction to these new features. Following the introduction are four chapters that provide a complete technical specification of the features. 这个章节将介绍这些新特性。随后的四个章节的介绍将提供有关特性的完整技术规范 The language extensions in C# 2.0 were designed to ensure maximum compatibility with existing code. For example, even though C# 2.0 gives special meaning to the words where, yield, and partial in certain contexts, these words can still be used as identifiers. Indeed, C# 2.0 adds no new keywords as such keywords could conflict with identifiers in existing code. c#2.0中的语言扩展最大程度上保证和现有代码的兼容。举例说,即使c#2.0指定以下词如yield,partial在特定的上下文有特有的意义,他们依然可以作为标示符。甚至,c#2.0没有加任何新的可能会在现有代码冲突的关键词 Generics Generics permit classes, structs, interfaces, delegates, and methods to be parameterized by the types of data they store and manipulate. C# generics will be immediately familiar to users of generics in Eiffel or Ada, or to users of C++ templates, though they do not suffer many of the complications of the latter. 泛型允许类,结构,接口,代理和方法被他们存储操作的数据类型参数化。C#泛型将很快被eiffel,ada的使用过泛型的用户熟悉,或是使用过c++templates,尽管他们不需要忍受以后的多种编译器。 Why generics? Without generics, general purpose data structures can use type object to store data of any type. For example, the following simple Stack class stores its data in an object array, and its two methods, Push and Pop, use object to accept and return data, respectively: 如果没有泛型,一般数据结构能使用类型对象去存储任何数据类型。举例,下面所描述的一个很简单的栈的类存储数据在对象数组中。它有两个方法push和pop,使用对象分别地去接受和返回数据 public class Stack{object[] items;int count; public void Push(object item) {...} public object Pop() {...}} While the use of type object makes the Stack class very flexible, it is not without drawbacks. For example, it is possible to push a value of any type, such a Customer instance, onto a stack. However, when a value is retrieved, the result of the Pop method must explicitly be cast back to the appropriate type, which is tedious to write and carries a performance penalty for run-time type checking: 当使用对象类型的时候栈类的使用更灵活,它并非没有缺陷。举例说,它很可能压入任何类型的值,如一个customer实例