当前位置: 首页 > 图文教程 > 操作系统 > Unix/Linux > stallman 谈黑客

Unix/Linux
Linux基础知识99问(一)
剖析Linux系统启动过程
Linux日志式文件系统面面观
Linux的引导过程剖析
Linux环境下使用JFS文件系统
Linux环境下的ReiserFS文件系统
Linux环境中使用Ext3文件系统
Linux环境下使用XFS文件系统
解析Linux特殊文件
Linux操作系统内核编译详解
Linux中BSD套接口开发的基础介绍
Linux内核模块和驱动的编写
如何编写Linux设备驱动程序
编写Linux实用程序的艺术
分析Windows和Linux动态库
Linux环境下的高级隐藏技术
Linux操作系统发展简史
混合使用Linux和Windows
浅谈linux操作系统的优化及安全
轻松解决 Linux操作系统故障恢复技巧

Unix/Linux 中的 stallman 谈黑客


出处:互联网   整理: 软晨网(RuanChen.com)   发布: 2009-11-01   浏览: 52 ::
收藏到网摘: n/a

It is hard to write a simple definition of something as varied ashacking, but I think what these activities have in common isplayfulness, cleverness, and exploration. Thus, hacking meansexploring the limits of what is possible, in a spirit of playfulcleverness. Activities that display playful cleverness have "hackvalue".
Hackers typically had little respect for the silly rules thatadministrators like to impose, so they looked for ways around. Forinstance, when computers at MIT started to have "security" (that is,restrictions on what users could do), some hackers found clever waysto bypass the security, partly so they could use the computers freely,and partly just for the sake of cleverness (hacking does not need tobe useful). However, only some hackers did this--many were occupiedwith other kinds of cleverness, such as placing some amusing object ontop of MIT's great dome (**),finding a way to do a certain computation with only 5 instructionswhen the shortest known program required 6, writing a program to printnumbers in roman numerals, or writing a program to understandquestions in English.

Meanwhile, another group of hackers at MIT found a different solutionto the problem of computer security: they designed the Incompatible Timesharing System without security "features". In the hacker'sparadise, the glory days of the Artificial Intelligence Lab, there wasno security breaking, because there was no security to break. It wasthere, in that environment, that I learned to be a hacker, though Ihad shown the inclination previously. We had plenty of other domainsin which to be playfully clever, without building artificial securityobstacles which then had to be overcome.
Yet when I say I am a hacker, people often think I am making a naughtyadmission, presenting myself specifically as a security breaker. Howdid this confusion develop?
Around 1980, when the news media took notice of hackers, they fixatedon one narrow aspect of real hacking: the security breaking which somehackers occasionally did. They ignored all the rest of hacking, andtook the term to mean breaking security, no more and no less. The media have since spread that definition, disregarding our attempts tocorrect them. As a result, most people have a mistaken idea of whatwe hackers actually do and what we think.
You can help correct the misunderstanding simply by making adistinction between security breaking and hacking--by using the term"cracking" for security breaking. The people who do it are"crackers". Some of them may also be hackers, just as some of themmay be chess players or golfers; most of them are not.