当前位置: 首页 > 图文教程 > 操作系统 > Unix/Linux > stallman 谈黑客

Unix/Linux
使用yum把内核升级到Kernel 2.6.0test9
请问如何在vi中做到高亮显示?
Firefly 的Xft2 for Fedora下载安装
如何设置cygwin控制台字体高亮显示?
SWT(implemented with gtk)的可视化控件的X11窗口句柄
发现PUTTY的一个弱点
rh9.0的apache怎么没有htdoc这个文件夹啊
网络字节序的问题
linux filesystem 1TB limited?
防火墙iptables的一个有些难度的问题(虚心请教高手)
总结INIT :Id "2" respawing too fast :disable for 5
编译完内核让它支持ntfs之后,只需要make dep就可以吗?
在Virtual PC 5.2上配置Debian的网络
如何设置同一用户同一时间只能有一个人登陆啊??
讨论一下:mount 时会不会提示本地目录已经mount了一个了?
can't add this user?why?
有没有可能突破扩展分区上逻辑分区15个的限制?
1.网友文章:一Linux系统的入侵分析 (2002年6月11日)
Debian参考手册
提供在turbolinux7.0下安装拨号服务器的方法!

Unix/Linux 中的 stallman 谈黑客


出处:互联网   整理: 软晨网(RuanChen.com)   发布: 2009-11-01   浏览: 85 ::
收藏到网摘: n/a

It is hard to write a simple definition of something as varied ashacking, but I think what these activities have in common isplayfulness, cleverness, and exploration. Thus, hacking meansexploring the limits of what is possible, in a spirit of playfulcleverness. Activities that display playful cleverness have "hackvalue".
Hackers typically had little respect for the silly rules thatadministrators like to impose, so they looked for ways around. Forinstance, when computers at MIT started to have "security" (that is,restrictions on what users could do), some hackers found clever waysto bypass the security, partly so they could use the computers freely,and partly just for the sake of cleverness (hacking does not need tobe useful). However, only some hackers did this--many were occupiedwith other kinds of cleverness, such as placing some amusing object ontop of MIT's great dome (**),finding a way to do a certain computation with only 5 instructionswhen the shortest known program required 6, writing a program to printnumbers in roman numerals, or writing a program to understandquestions in English.

Meanwhile, another group of hackers at MIT found a different solutionto the problem of computer security: they designed the Incompatible Timesharing System without security "features". In the hacker'sparadise, the glory days of the Artificial Intelligence Lab, there wasno security breaking, because there was no security to break. It wasthere, in that environment, that I learned to be a hacker, though Ihad shown the inclination previously. We had plenty of other domainsin which to be playfully clever, without building artificial securityobstacles which then had to be overcome.
Yet when I say I am a hacker, people often think I am making a naughtyadmission, presenting myself specifically as a security breaker. Howdid this confusion develop?
Around 1980, when the news media took notice of hackers, they fixatedon one narrow aspect of real hacking: the security breaking which somehackers occasionally did. They ignored all the rest of hacking, andtook the term to mean breaking security, no more and no less. The media have since spread that definition, disregarding our attempts tocorrect them. As a result, most people have a mistaken idea of whatwe hackers actually do and what we think.
You can help correct the misunderstanding simply by making adistinction between security breaking and hacking--by using the term"cracking" for security breaking. The people who do it are"crackers". Some of them may also be hackers, just as some of themmay be chess players or golfers; most of them are not.