当前位置: 首页 > 图文教程 > 操作系统 > Unix/Linux > stallman 谈黑客

Unix/Linux
Linux 下采用软件实现RAID
汉化你的RedHat全攻略(2)- TrueType字体的使用
汉化你的RedHat全攻略(3)- RedHat 7.0上的中文环境和输入法
汉化你的RedHat全攻略(4)- FAQ和一些总结
Linux与其他操作系统的区别
为什么我用 ipchains 构建的子网里的机器不能用 ftp?
轻轻松松的安装Slackware Linux -- 0.自序,观念篇
Linux命令Man解释:ftpaccess(5) :ftpd 的配置文件
Linux命令Man解释:chsh :更换你登入时所用的shell
Linux命令Man解释:chfn :改变你的finger讯息
Linux命令Man解释:apropos :在whatis资料库中搜寻特定字串
X-Window中如何设置字体
rpm命令参数列表
汉化你的RedHat全攻略(1)- 中文环境和中文输入法的安装
Linux命令Man解释:MIRROR:镜像远端节点上的档案
Linux命令Man解释:losetup :设定与控制loop devices
Linux命令Man解释:lilo :安装引导装载程序
Linux命令Man解释:groupmod :修改组
Linux命令Man解释:shutdown:让系统关机
Linux命令Man解释:SUDO(8):以root身份执行指令

Unix/Linux 中的 stallman 谈黑客


出处:互联网   整理: 软晨网(RuanChen.com)   发布: 2009-11-01   浏览: 67 ::
收藏到网摘: n/a

It is hard to write a simple definition of something as varied ashacking, but I think what these activities have in common isplayfulness, cleverness, and exploration. Thus, hacking meansexploring the limits of what is possible, in a spirit of playfulcleverness. Activities that display playful cleverness have "hackvalue".
Hackers typically had little respect for the silly rules thatadministrators like to impose, so they looked for ways around. Forinstance, when computers at MIT started to have "security" (that is,restrictions on what users could do), some hackers found clever waysto bypass the security, partly so they could use the computers freely,and partly just for the sake of cleverness (hacking does not need tobe useful). However, only some hackers did this--many were occupiedwith other kinds of cleverness, such as placing some amusing object ontop of MIT's great dome (**),finding a way to do a certain computation with only 5 instructionswhen the shortest known program required 6, writing a program to printnumbers in roman numerals, or writing a program to understandquestions in English.

Meanwhile, another group of hackers at MIT found a different solutionto the problem of computer security: they designed the Incompatible Timesharing System without security "features". In the hacker'sparadise, the glory days of the Artificial Intelligence Lab, there wasno security breaking, because there was no security to break. It wasthere, in that environment, that I learned to be a hacker, though Ihad shown the inclination previously. We had plenty of other domainsin which to be playfully clever, without building artificial securityobstacles which then had to be overcome.
Yet when I say I am a hacker, people often think I am making a naughtyadmission, presenting myself specifically as a security breaker. Howdid this confusion develop?
Around 1980, when the news media took notice of hackers, they fixatedon one narrow aspect of real hacking: the security breaking which somehackers occasionally did. They ignored all the rest of hacking, andtook the term to mean breaking security, no more and no less. The media have since spread that definition, disregarding our attempts tocorrect them. As a result, most people have a mistaken idea of whatwe hackers actually do and what we think.
You can help correct the misunderstanding simply by making adistinction between security breaking and hacking--by using the term"cracking" for security breaking. The people who do it are"crackers". Some of them may also be hackers, just as some of themmay be chess players or golfers; most of them are not.